Censored Editorials
By J. Adams
(Feel free to download these editorials for reading
and distribution.)
No newspapers or news organizations have been willing
to go public
with the following editorials or the general opinions expressed
in them.
"War to the hilt between communism and capitalism
is
inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to
attack. Our time will come in thirty or forty years. To win,
we shall need the element of surprise. The Western world will
need to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the
most spectacular peace movement on record. There shall be
electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The
capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to
cooperate to their own destruction. They will leap at another
chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall
smash them with our clenched fist."
(Dmitrii Z. Manuilskii)
(Lenin School of Political Warfare, Moscow, 1931)
***CENSORSHIP IN THE MEDIA***
By J. Adams November 28th, 1995 USSR, 3rd World Countries & US
WWW: http://www.primenet.com:80/~lion/j.html The following editorials
were submitted to my local newspaper over the past three years,
and the last three have been sent to almost every major newspaper
in the country. None of them have ever been printed by my local
newspaper or any other newspaper. The excuses given by my local
paper for not printing these opeds were usually the same. First
off, the editor would argue the given editorial is too long.
Consequently, when submitting my work, I made sure to point to
recent editorials and columns printed by the newspaper that were
of approximately the same length or longer. I would always ask
the editor why a double standard is applied when dealing with
my writings. Another reason given by the newspaper for not printing
these editorials was my request that they be printed in full
and without unpermitted revisions. The reason I would request
this is because my past letters-to-the-editor and editorials
that were printed had, at times, had two-thirds of their content
removed. I asserted that such revisions were virtual censorship
and geared to manipulate the meaning of what I had written. Thus,
I would not offer the editors of my local paper a free hand to
edit my writings. The final reason given for not printing these
editorials was made most clear by the current editorial page
editor of my local newspaper who refused to print "The New
World Disorder", my most recent oped, because of "problems
with content". Specifically, she said that the views espoused
were "libelous" to the Russian government. Also, I
was told that the opinions I offered were not backed-up with
"sufficient facts". I responded that my speculations
about the malintentions of the Russian government were only my
opinions and recanted that what I wrote was not much different
than media speculation about the activities of the U.S. government
and other governments around the world. Furthermore, I pointed
out that, in order to constrain the length of my op-ed, which
I was told was too long to begin with, I had to limit the amount
of "facts" that could be presented. In order to refer
readers to comprehensive supporting articles and factual material,
I placed a reference to my worldwide web page at the end of the
editorial. The editorial page editor replied that the commentary
page would not be used to "advertise" my web page.
All in all, because of effective censorship by my local newspaper
as well as media organizations across the country, I have been
rather unsuccessful in my efforts over the past several years
to stir public awareness of the threat posed to freedom, democracy
and Western society by the "former" Soviet Union. The
editorial "discretion" of the American media is, in
fact, a subjective bias that has been suppressing the truth at
everyone's expense. Fortunately, by way of the internet, I have
found an alternative means by which to tell the American people
the truth. This, however, may prove to be a short- lived opportunity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
***THE NEW WORLD DISORDER***
By J. Adams October 18th, 1995 USSR, 3rd World Countries & US
WWW: http://www.primenet.com:80/~lion/j.html Given the 50th anniversary
of the United Nations and the Nuremburg trials of Nazi war criminals,
it is time for people to reflect on the history of this world
and consider how we, in shaping the future, can take steps to
insure that the mistakes of the past are not repeated. Little
do most of you know just how important such a quest is at the
current juncture. Today human rights and the rule of law, as
well as our freedom and livelihood, are imperiled even more so
than when Adolph Hitler was rallying the forces of hate and war
during the 1930's. Few perceive this threat, because, for the
most part, Western civilization is currently living a dangerous
lie. In the mid-1980's, Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in the
Soviet Union and started implementing seemingly pro-Western,
peace-oriented policies based upon "New Thinking" by
Kremlin leaders. What followed, to the delight of the West, was
the fall of Communism, the breakup of the Soviet empire and an
apparent end to the Cold War. Thus, today people take great comfort
that a democratic "New World Order" of international
peace and cooperation is at hand where there is little or no
risk of a global war launched by the formerly unified authoritarian
powers of the East. Unfortunately, all that the world has been
led to believe over the past decade is literally too good to
be true. Kremlin military leaders realized long ago that the
most effective use of modern strategic weaponry, particularly
nuclear missiles, requires the element of surprise. Furthermore,
it was clear that launching an attack against the West would
invite massive retaliation against the numerous military, political
and economic targets spread throughout the Communist world. Thus,
a large-scale, multi-year plan needed to be devised and implemented
that would instill a false sense of security in the West while
minimizing the vulnerability of world Communism. Low and behold,
the Kremlin's "New Thinking" started to develop. The
"New Thinking" of Russia's ruling elite, introduced
by Mikhail Gorbachev in the mid-1980's, has been geared to mislead
the West for the sake of launching a global war of mass destruction.
After the dust settles, the Kremlin, which is the historic site
of combined Church and State power in Russia, plans to replace
Western secular society with a global "Orthodox" dictatorship.
In order to justify a transfer of world leadership to the East,
the West is being framed for triggering world war three by luring
America and its military allies into a trap by way of the United
Nations. Consistent with Leninist strategy, since the 1980's
the West has been told what it wants to hear and shown what it
wants to see. Bogus Western-style economic and political reforms
were introduced in Russia similar to Lenin's "New Economic
Policy" and *Glasnost* of the 1920's. Then, following a
farcical coup attempt by "Communist hardliners" in
August 1991, the Communist party supposedly voted itself out
of power. Following the resignation of Mikhail Gorbachev on Christmas
Day of 1991, the Soviet Union was disbanded and Yeltsin's "democratic"
Russia was born. Thus, for the past few years there has been
a seeming marriage of East and West, Russia and America, as the
once adversarial superpowers apparently have overcome their ideological
and geopolitical differences in the name of world peace and prosperity.
The Cold War is now declared over as one peace and disarmament
agreement after another has been signed and troops on both sides
are returning to their respective homelands. Unfortunately, the
honeymoon might soon end, for Russia's experiment with capitalism
and democracy is reportedly failing. According to Marxist-Leninist
doctrine, if democracy fails to serve the purposes of capitalism,
then democracy is overthrown and replaced with a fascist dictatorship.
This is supposedly what happened in Weimar Germany during the
1920's and 1930's and led to the rise of Adolph Hitler. Accordingly,
in fact *according to plan*, in recent years Russia's economy
has fallen apart, prices have spiralled out- of-control and neofascist
forces have gained strength in Russian politics. This is highlighted
by the *surprising* victory of Vladimir Zhirinovsky's "Liberal
Democratic Party" in the December 1993 election of a new
Russian parliament (something I specifically predicted beforehand,
since I was relatively certain the elections would be rigged).
The general strategy is, now that the West no longer fears an
attack from the military powers of the East, a right-wing military
coup can be staged in Moscow that will open the way for a surprise
third world war. By drawing America and its military allies into
conflicts with former Russian allies like the Serbs, Iraq and
North Korea by way of the United Nations, a nationalist backlash
is created in Moscow. This, in turn, creates a pretext for a
bogus Zhirinovsky coup and massive military aggression against
Israel, America and the Western powers. Such an onslaught today,
after years of peace and cooperation, will catch the West by
surprise. Furthermore, since Russia is now seen as a democratic
friend, the U.S. will be hesitant about striking-back following
a nuclear attack. Even if we do retaliate, the majority of the
"former"-Communist world is currently safe since it
has disintegrated and is no longer perceived as hostile territory.
Thus, after the dust settles, Western society will be destroyed
while the Communist world-of-old is left relatively unscathed-
just as the Kremlin has planned. If my hypothesis is correct,
then the outbreak of world war three will appear to stem from
the use of Western military strength against the seemingly weakened
powers of the East. Accordingly, the world will wrongly attribute
the holocaust of mass destruction to blundering Western aggression
rather than the premeditated pursuits of the East. Following
the war, this perception may be used by Moscow to justify replacing
the United Nations and current, U.S.-led New World Order with
a Russian-led world government. Meanwhile, Mikhail Gorbachev,
who in recent weeks has been outlining his own vision of a New
World Order in the mass media, will undoubtedly return to power
in Moscow. Since it will appear as if he is saving the world
from self-destruction by neofascist extremists like Vladimir
Zhirinovsky, his *second coming* will open the way for the establishment
of global Orthodoxy and a false "kingdom of god". Remarkably,
the ultimate crime against humanity I believe is unfolding is
probably being committed according to astrology. It is well known
that Adolph Hitler used astrology in timing his key moves and
military campaigns during the second world war. Likewise, there
is evidence that suggests the Kremlin is also using astrology
to implement a deceptive, multi-year plan leading to the third
world war. First off, Chernobyl, which was probably no accident
but rather an experiment to prepare for fighting a nuclear war,
occurred with a rare astrological configuration involving mars,
pluto and a lunar eclipse. Likewise, Iraq's invasion of Kuwait
in 1990, which was likely carried-out by Saddam under Kremlin
orders, occurred with the same type of configuration. Now we
are facing a similar astrological configuration once again. On
October 23rd/24th, the 50th anniversary of the opening of the
United Nations, there is a total solar eclipse in Scorpio, the
zodiac sign of death, that is conjunct Mars, the planet of war,
and Pluto, the planet of nuclear energy ("pluto"nium).
Thus, to an astrologer, the upcoming configuration represents
the death of the unity of nations and nuclear war. One way or
another, and probably sooner than later, this is what the Kremlin
has in store for the world. For more information, please see
my worldwide web page at the location (URL): http://www.primenet.com:80/~lion/j.html
(Note that on October 26th, two days after the solar eclipse
and when the moon aligned with Mars and Pluto, Russian President
Boris Yeltsin reportedly suffered a heart attack precipitating
political uncertainty and instability in Moscow. Eventually this
may lead to a bogus right-wing coup in Moscow or some sort of
related political crisis, possibly in association with the Russian
parliamentary elections slated for mid-December of this year.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
***A TIME FOR WAR***
By J. Adams February, 1993 USSR, 3rd World Countries & US WWW:
http://www.primenet.com:80/~lion/j.html Soon after he came to
power in the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev released a book
entitled 'A Time For Peace'. With the emergence of Gorbachev
and his supposedly peace-oriented ways, the West took great comfort
that finally the militant East would no longer pose a threat
and the Cold War could be brought to an end. Indeed, everything,
right up to the breakup of Russia's so-called 'communist' empire,
has taken place to lead us to believe 'it is peace for our time'.
But really, is it a 'New World Order' and global peace which
is at hand, or a new world disorder and global war. Increasingly
popular opinion is calling for no appeasement in Bosnia. More
and more Americans are urging Western military intervention in
Yugoslavia to bring stability to the region. However, let it
be clear that the West should have refrained from appeasement
long ago, but not with Serbia- with Russia. There is reason to
believe that what the West is walking into right now is a trap
set by Moscow in which Yugoslavia and Iraq are the bait. The
explosive ethnic conflict taking place today in what was once
Yugoslavia is a product of blatant Serbian aggression. It turns
out, however, that Serbia is being sponsored by its historical
slavic ally- Russia. More specifically, even though there is
a tight arms embargo on Yugoslavia, the Russians are continuing
to underhandedly supply the Serbs with the weapons being used
to overrun Bosnia. That Russia is doing this completely goes
against Moscow's supposed devotion to resolving the crisis and
preserving the New World Order of international cooperation,
peace, and security. Furthermore, it raises serious questions
about just what is going on in the Balkans. Russia's suspect
activity with regard to Yugoslavia, however, shadows in comparison
to its policy towards Iraq. For those who have not been watching
(e.g., the Western media), Russia sent a senior diplomat to Baghdad
for three days during the second week of February whose stated
purpose was to "consolidate friendly ties with Iraq".
This visit has significant implications. First off, it establishes
growing open Russian support for Saddam Hussein. Secondly, just
as with arming Serbia, building ties with Iraq is profoundly
inconsistent with Moscow's supposed devotion to international
peace and security. Russia's handshake with Saddam in February
should come as no surprise to those who have kept a critical
eye on Moscow and Baghdad since the Gulf Crisis broke out in
the summer of 1990. There has been strong indications that Iraq's
invasion of Kuwait and the subsequent Gulf War were part of a
large-scale deception being engineered by Russia. Iraq and Russia
had been close allies for some thirty years going into the invasion,
and it thus makes sense that Moscow has been behind Saddam Hussein's
seemingly irrational actions from day one. The strong alliance
that developed between Moscow and Baghdad during the 1970's and
1980's can be directly attributed to the personal efforts of
Saddam Hussein. Saddam played a principal role in forging an
Iraqi 'Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation' with Russia in 1972,
and when Saddam took over power in 1979, he signed an agreement
on military cooperation and strategic consultation with then
Soviet Defense Minister Ustinov. During the 1980's the Soviets
helped Saddam consolidate his power and built Iraq into a regional
military superpower. Given the deep and dependent relationship
he formed with Moscow, it is clear Saddam would have never pulled-off
a stunt as reckless as invading Kuwait and challenging the West
without the Kremlin's approval. The reality, however, is that
Saddam's invasion of Kuwait was not only approved by Russia,
it was planned and carried out under the orders and supervision
of Moscow. During the six months prior to the invasion, Soviet
arms deliveries to Iraq accelerated to twice the rate of the
1980's when Iraq was in an all-out war with Iran. Two weeks before
the invasion, the Soviets launched a military reconnaisance satellite
over the Gulf and sent one of their top generals to Iraq along
with a small expert staff. This general and his delegation, along
with the 8,000 Soviet personnel that were already in Iraq, provided
direct 'Quality Edge' military assistance to the Iraqi invasion
of Kuwait. Soviet assistance in planning and executing the invasion
was made clear by the surprising similarity of the operation
to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. In the aftermath
of the invasion, Moscow did everything it took to open the way
for a Western-led attack against Saddam Hussein's forces but
continued to underhandedly support its Iraqi ally. Even though
it clearly went against Soviet strategic interests, Moscow, for
the first time in post-war history, cooperated with the West
in the United Nations so that a U.S.-led military coalition could
launch a war to free Kuwait from Iraqi occupation. Meanwhile,
the Soviets continued to send arms to Iraq in violation of an
international embargo, they fed Iraq intelligence on Western
forces building up in the Gulf, and Soviet personnel helped the
Iraqis jam eavesdropping by Western aircraft. With the Gulf War,
Moscow continued to work behind the scenes with Iraq. The Soviets
continued to underhandedly ship arms to Iraq and, as the National
Defense Council Foundation later reported, Soviet personnel were
"all over the place" on the battlefield. Russian language
military communiques were persistently heard on Iraqi radio networks;
Soviet technicians "continued to tune radars, fix tanks
and planes and advise (Iraqi) combat units down to the battalion
level"; and the Soviets supplied targeting information to
Iraq and had their personnel "help the Iraqis fire SCUD
missiles at Israel and Saudi Arabia". The reason that Moscow
has been deceptively making peace with one hand and war with
the other in the Persian Gulf and the Balkans should be clear.
Throughout Russian history, strategic deception and military
aggression has been the central way by which the Kremlin has
expanded its control. This approach served Russia well in dominating
virtually the entire East of this world, and so it should come
as no surprise that such a strategy is now being used to conquer
the world. If the West intervenes in Yugoslavia and/or renews
hostilities against Iraq, you can bet that Russia will suddenly
do a total about- face. As Western military action is taken,
a militant neofascist dictator can be brought to power in Russia
by throwing some sort of bogus coup like in August 1991. This
dictator- and I'll even tell you his name: Vladimir Zhirinovsky-
can then be used to launch a third world war against Israel,
America, and the Western allies, just as had been planned from
the beginning by Gorbachev. Because it will appear to stem from
Western military intervention in Yugoslavia and Iraq, the supposed
power shift in Russia and seemingly consequent world war will
be blamed on the 'imperialist' actions of the West rather than
the premeditated efforts of the guilty East. After the dust settles,
Gorbachev can reemerge to power claiming that 'he' has come to
save the world from self-destruction. Russian orthodoxy can be
established in the place of communism and a global dictatorship
of man- Gorbachev's false 'kingdom of god'- will be achieved.
It seems as with Europe during the late-1930's, the world today
has been easily deceived. Just as Hitler made peace before war
in accordance with his 'Big Lie' dictum, Russia has befriended
America and its allies over the last several years in accordance
with deceptive long-run strategic planning. Like with Neville
Chamberlain, we should have never appeased our enemy's lies by
signing 'paper' treaties and overlooking the gross inconsistencies
in the words and actions of our foe which have invariably pointed
toward an underlying intention to make war rather than peace.
If you want to be set free, no longer falsely believe it is 'peace
for our time' as Chamberlain foolishly proclaimed in 1938. Find
the courage to accept the truth. It is a time for war... * *
* * * REFERENCES Barkho, Leon. "Russian envoy arrives in
Baghdad". 'Reuters Library Report': 2/8/93. Bodansky, Yossef.
"Moscow's careful juggling act in the Persian Gulf".
'Defense and Foreign Affairs' Strategic Policy': 12/90; p18.
Daily, Brian (ed). 'Soviet Strategic Deception'. Hoover Institution
Press; Stanford, CA: 1987. Douglass, Joseph. 'Soviet Strategy
for Nuclear War'. Hoover Institution Press; Stanford, CA: 1979.
Johnson, Michael. "Strategic Simpletons". 'The Geopolitical
Strategist': 1/1/91. Pipes, Richard. "Why the Soviet Union
Thinks it could Fight & Win a Nuclear War". 'Commentary':
7/77; p21. Schweizer, Peter. "Is Moscow playing cute on
Kuwait?". 'The New York Times': 8/22/90; pA25. Sleeper,
Raymond (ed). 'Mesmerized by the Bear: the Soviet Strategy of
Deception'. Dodd, Mead & Co.; New York, NY: 1987. Walte, Juan.
"Some secrets of Gulf War might never be told". 'Gannett
News Service': 3/19/91. "Washington Whispers: Brothers in
arms". 'U.S. News & World Report': 8/10/92; p18. Yanov,
Alexander. 'The Russian Challenge and the Year 2000'. Basil Blackwell
Inc.; New York, NY: 1987. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
***THE PRICE OF FALSE PEACE***
By J. Adams March, 1993 USSR, 3rd World Countries & US WWW: http://www.primenet.com:80/~lion/j.html
Peace in today's world is well represented by the modern peace
symbol: a satanic symbol in which the Christian Cross is inverted
and broken. This signifies how peace in the modern age is false-
an antichristian lie. In the context of the current political
crisis in Russia, many people believe that we should stand behind
Boris Yeltsin at all costs. This, they would say, is the price
of peace. In the eyes of most Americans, Yeltsin is a hero of
Russian democracy who the U.S. and its allies must stand by lest
the communist 'hardliners' return to power and renew the expensive
Cold War. This point-of-view, however, is symptomatic of a popular
delusion afflicting the world with regard to the true pursuits
of Russia and its leaders. Until the truth of this situation
is accepted, humanity will remain enslaved by lies. Democracy
in Russia has never existed. For those who have bought the idea
that Boris Yeltsin is the first democratically elected leader
of Russia in the country's 1000-year history, you better think
again. The Russian presidential election in June of 1991- a point
at which Soviet communism was still visibly intact- was fraudulent.
If you find this difficult to believe, I strongly suggest you
examine the political life of Vladimir Zhirinovsky- the upcoming
neofascist dictator of Russia. Vladimir Zhirinovsky is an important
but weak link in a strategic deception Russia has been feeding
the West since Gorbachev's 'New Thinking' was introduced in the
mid-1980's. He supposedly received nearly seven million votes
and came in third out of a field of seven candidates in the Russian
presidential election. Given the neofascist platform of his misleadingly
called 'Liberal Democratic Party', Zhirinovsky's success in the
election came as a complete surprise. What came as an even greater
surprise, however, were results from investigations of Zhirinovsky's
political registration and the August coup in 1991. In December
of 1991, investigators revealed that, "...to all intents
and purposes, the Liberal Democratic Party, headed by Vladimir
Zhirinovsky, does not exist". Of course, if Zhirinovsky
had no party and, in turn, no base of support, how is it that
he received millions of votes and came in a surprising third
in the race for the Russian presidency? Clearly the election
results were impossible. The implication should be obvious: the
supposedly democratic election for the first Russian president,
won by Boris Yeltsin, was a fraud. Just two months after Yeltsin
became president of Russia, he apparently saved his country and
democratic reforms from a coup attempt by communist hardliners.
Unfortunately, like the Russian presidential election, the August
coup of 1991 was also fraudulent- a Potemkin masquerade intended
for Western audiences. During the first half of 1991, the Soviets
carefully set the stage for the bogus August putsch. Six months
prior to the actual coup, the KGB and Soviet army rehearsed their
upcoming act under the guise of a countercoup. During the summer
of 1991, numerous rumors and warnings were circulated in the
West that a coup was imminent, and in June hardliners reportedly
failed at a constitutional-coup attempt. As tension grew, Gorbachev
strangely ignored all the warning signs of an approaching putsch
by hardliners and refused to take precautionary measures. Then,
on the weekend just before the controversial signing of a new
union treaty that would undermine the Kremlin's central authority,
Gorbachev made the seemingly reckless decision to go on vacation
to his dacha in the Crimea. Low and behold, on Monday- the weekday
Lenin stressed never to throw a coup- hardline communist conspirators
acted (literally). From beginning to end, the August putsch was
a nonsensical tale. The KGB, Soviet military, and hardline conspirators
behind the coup attempt failed to follow almost every rule of
Soviet-designed coups. To begin with, reliable troops weren't
prepositioned at key facilities, and communication and transportation
links with the outside world were left unsevered. Even worse,
the organizers of the coup failed to have the main opposition
leader, Boris Yeltsin, detained or isolated- an unbelievable
oversight. As Yeltsin took refuge at the parliamentary 'White
House' and began rallying opposition, no one cut the phonelines.
Furthermore, the media, which the putchists had taken control
of, was somehow allowed to broadcast Yeltsin's appeals for resistance
and international support. Amazingly, throughout the whole affair
Gorbachev's remaining allies and the Russian KGB that backed
Yeltsin were organizing opposition from Kremlin offices literally
down the hall from where the coup plotters and the Soviet KGB
were headquartered. The reason that political events in Russia
during the summer of 1991 were so utterly nonsensical is because
they were just that: nonsense. Both the Russian presidential
election and the August coup were staged as part of a large-scale
political deception designed to serve the power-maximizing interests
of Russia's ruling elite. Yeltsin's democratic victory that summer
at the Russian White House under the red-white-and-blue Russian
flag was a lie that the West was easily seduced by. However,
a democratic transformation of Russia remains about as likely
as a communist revolution in America. Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and
all the supposed reformers in Moscow to this day are 'ex-communists'
and 'hardliners' who pursue but one thing: authoritarian power.
Today the underlying goal of Gorbachev's New Thinking is about
to be realized. The stage is being set for a neofascist dictator
to take power in today's 'Weimar Russia'. That dictator, Vladimir
Zhirinovsky, is already revealing the true pursuit of Russia:
to wage an all-out third world war against Israel, America, and
the Western allies. Unfortunately, because the West has accepted
the false peace and friendship Russia and her Arab allies have
offered over the past several years, the East will militarily
prevail. Not only have we been duped into dropping our guard,
our enemy has effectively disappeared. Should 'democratic' Russia
launch a surprise nuclear blow in the midst of seeming internal
chaos and a violent international crisis, we will be greatly
hesitant about retaliating during the crucial minutes before
being destroyed. And even if we do decide to strike back, we
will only target well-defended Mother Russia; the rest of the
communist world has been secured through disintegration. After
the dust settles, Gorbachev will undoubtedly 'return' to power
in Moscow. Instead of realizing how he destroyed the world, people
will falsely believe that he has 'saved' the world from militant
extremists. Russian orthodoxy can be established in the place
of communism, and a global dictatorship of man, Gorbachev's false
'kingdom of god', will be achieved. * * * * * REFERENCES "Accusations
by the White House". 'Current Digest of the Soviet Press':
1/29/92; p23. Church, George. "Postmortem; anatomy of a
coup". 'Time': 9/2/91; p32. Daily, Brian (ed). 'Soviet Strategic
Deception'. Hoover Institution Press; Stanford, CA: 1987. Douglas,
Joseph. 'Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War'. Hoover Institution
Press; Stanford, CA: 1979. Epstein, Edward Jay. 'Deception: The
Invisible War Between the KGB and the CIA'. Simon & Schuster;
New York, NY: 1989. Fireman, Ken. "Ultranationalism is a
growing force in Russia". 'The Houston Chronicle': 1/3/93;
pA18. Golitsyn, Anatoliy. 'New Lies For Old: The Communist Strategy
of Deception and Disinformation'. Dodd, Mead & Co.; New York,
NY: 1984. Parks, Michael & James Gerstenzang. "How we got
here; Diary of a doomed coup; A bungle-by-bungle look at how
Moscow's hardliners grabbed for power." 'Los Angeles Times':
9/3/91; p1. Pipes, Richard. "Why the Soviet Union Thinks
it could Fight and Win a Nuclear War". 'Commentary': 7/77;
p21. Sleeper, Raymond (ed). 'Mesmerized by the Bear: the Soviet
Strategy of Deception'. Dodd, Mead & Co.; New York, NY: 1987.
"Three days that shook the world". 'U.S. News & World
Report': 11/18/91; p52. Yanov, Alexander. 'The Russian Challenge
and the Year 2000'. Basil Blackwell Inc.; New York, NY: 1987.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
***JUDGMENT FOR OUR TIME***
By J. Adams October, 1993 USSR, 3rd World Countries & US WWW:
http://www.primenet.com:80/~lion/j.html Recently a violent political
struggle took place in Moscow that appears to have ended with
a final defeat of conservative Russian 'hardliners' and the victory
of liberal democracy. Likewise, the forces of militarism and
anti-Westernism appear to have been overcome by the forces of
pacifism and East/West friendship. The problem with this situation,
however, is that it is an illusion- an illusion that is about
to be utterly upset by reality. Earlier this year I wrote two
editorials that dealt with the political situation in Russia,
the war in Yugoslavia, and the ongoing troubles in the Persian
Gulf. Unfortunately, these editorials have never been printed
by a newspaper they were submitted to, i.e., they have been effectively
censored. The general idea of my editorials was reflected by
their titles: "The Price of False Peace" and "A
Time For War". In a nutshell, I spelled out why I believe
the modern world has accepted a total lie. Since Mikhail Gorbachev
came to power in the Soviet Union in 1985 and released a book
entitled 'A Time For Peace', everything has taken place to lead
us to believe in "peace for our time". Yet, world peace
today is likely no different than "peace for our time"
as proclaimed by Neville Chamberlain in 1938 after signing the
Munich Accord with Hitler. I believe that now, like then, the
West has foolishly accepted a false peace that serves the strategic
interests of those pursuing our destruction. The recent political
battle in Moscow is an example of Russia's deceptive strategy.
We have just witnessed a violent political showdown between Russia's
liberal reformers and hardline conservatives in which Boris Yeltsin,
the supposed champion of democracy, has effectively thrown a
coup. On September 21st, Yeltsin revoked the Soviet-era constitution
and disbanded parliament. In reaction to this, hardline lawmakers,
led by vice-president (?!) Alexander Rutskoi, barricaded themselves
in the Russian parliament building, the so-called "White
House", and prepared for armed resistance. Yeltsin gave
the lawmakers until October 4th to clear- out or face "serious
consequences". Then, on the eve of one of the most dangerous
political confrontations in Russian history, Yeltsin haphazardly
took-off to his summer house for the day. Right-wing and pro-communist
protesters seized the opportunity. They overtook surprisingly
weak police lines around the parliament and, under orders from
hardline leaders, began a violent uprising in Moscow. Because
no major forceful response was prepared or at least promptly
ordered by government and police authorities, the city quickly
dissolved into bloodshed and mayhem. When Yeltsin returned to
Moscow, a state of emergency was declared and the Russian military
was called upon to restore order by force. The protesters were
pushed back to the White House where they would make their last
stand. The next day, October 4th, Yeltsin ordered the army to
storm the parliament; the hardliners were forced to surrender.
As they were taken away under armed guard, the White House, where
Russian freedom and democracy was supposedly victorious against
the August coup of 1991, symbolically burned in the background.
Now, with Yeltsin's political opponents in jail and parliament
burned, democracy in Moscow is seemingly defeated. Through what
was tantamount to a coup, Yeltsin has effectively become sole
ruler of Russia. The key point here is that recent events in
Russia have been intentionally orchestrated as an historical
parallel to events in Weimar Germany some sixty years ago. The
last leader to revoke a constitution, disband parliament, burn
the "Reichstag", and take control of a fledgling democracy
was Adolph Hitler. The reason such an analogous situation has
been engineered is because the "true" hardliners, which
includes Boris Yeltsin, Mikhail Gorbachev, and the rest of communism's
rulers-of-old, are creating the excuse to stage a violent reversal
in power from liberal reform to right-wing extremism. More specifically,
the stage has been set for a bogus coup in which a neofascist
dictator, namely Vladimir Zhirinovsky, is brought to power. A
power reversal is being planned in Moscow in order to open the
way for a surprise third world war. Since the West backed Yeltsin's
drive to undo democracy, crush nationalist opponents, and conquer
Russia's "soul", Russian hardliners now have a pretense
for launching an all-out war against the "Zionist"
powers of Israel, America, and the Western allies. War may be
initially provoked in and around the Middle East- the Balkans
(Yugoslavia), the Persian Gulf (Iraq), the Causasus, etc.- but
this is only to set the stage for an onslaught against the Zionist
homeland: Israel. Since Israel will undoubtedly resort to nuclear
force against her Russian-backed Arab foes and possibly Russia
as well, Moscow will have the excuse it needs for "massive
retaliation", i.e., an all-out nuclear attack against America
and its military counterparts. Our leaders will subsequently
be hardput to retaliate since Russia was so recently a democratic
friend. With all said and done, through long-run strategic planning,
large-scale deception, and massive military aggression, the East
will have conquered the world. First off, military dominance
will have been achieved because the West was lulled into a false
sense of security, duped into dropping its guard, and left without
a visible enemy so that a successful surprise attack could be
launched. Secondly, popular dominance will have been achieved
because world war three was staged such that it appeared to be
the West's fault. The resultant hatred for the West will feed
into popular support for the East. Should the future confirm
my beliefs and expectations, then it's important people realize
why. As I see it, newspapers refuse to print my editorials because
the truth is literally blasphemy in a world dominated by lies.
Over the past 1000 years the rise of Western civilization has
coincided with the rise of an opposing worldview to Christianity.
This opposing worldview, what I've dubbed the secular paradigm,
is the historical antithesis of Christianity. According to it,
ours is a godless universe that started with a "Big Bang"
and is flowing towards ever greater disorder and meaninglessness.
This contradicts the idea that, since the moment of Creation,
God has carried out purposeful work to create ever greater organization
and meaning. According to the secular paradigm, life results
from a process of elimination that involves "random mutation"
and "natural selection". Contrariwise, Christians believe
that life comes from purposeful, orderly creation and divine
selection. With regard to society, the secular worldview holds
that, with the guidance of some imaginal "invisible hand",
selfishness and competition give rise to "general equilibrium".
This contradicts the Christian view that unselfish cooperation
and the grace of God bring forth social harmony. All in all,
the now dominant secular worldview is the antithesis of Christianity.
The problem, however, is that if Christ's worldview was realistic
and true, then the opposing secular worldview is false- it is
a popular delusion. As reflected by the cycles of history, the
reality is that man as a species suffers from general mental
and emotional "disequilibrium" and poses a danger to
himself and his environment. Because of people's greed, hatred,
arrogance, and fear, the contemporary world is caught up in a
bipolar disorder that is leading us toward self-destruction.
As the seventh seal opens and "The Crash" occurs, the
popular expectations of this secular age will be totally upset
while the opposing expectations embodied in biblical prophecy
are fulfilled. This will reveal the truthfulness of religion
and falsify the modern secular delusion. If mankind finds the
courage to accept the truth and learns to love, then individual
and social harmony, real peace, and the true "Kingdom of
God" will be achieved. If not, then this world will meet
a tragic End. * * * * * REFERENCES Gevorkyan, Natalya & Alexander
Zhilin. "A President's trap? A trap for the President?"
'Moscow News': 10/15/93. Goldberg, Carey. "'October Events'
mysteries: Russians still have doubts." 'Los Angeles Times':
11/9/93; pA1. "Parliament swallowed the President's bait."
(Supposedly written by a top secret KGB official whose expertise
is fomenting uprisings and coups in third world countries- i.e.,
the article is disinformation from a disinformation source.)
'Moscow News': 10/15/93. NOTE: The two Moscow News articles cited
above are disinformation intended to make sense of the nonsense
that occurred during the October uprising by attributing the
staged crisis to Boris Yeltsin and Russia's supposed liberal
reformers. In reality, the whole affair was orchestrated to set
the stage for the December parliamentary elections in which right-wing
extremists and pro- communists, who were seemingly victimized
by the October events, achieved surprising success. Most important
was the victory of Vladimir Zhirinovsky's "Liberal Democratic
Party" (?!) in the election of the new Russian parliament.
Zhirinovsky was given political power in December of 1993 to
open the way for a future military coup (see "The Zhirinovsky
Connection") which, in turn, will open the way for a third
world war against the West- a point reiterated time and time
again in my editorials.
|